Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1029

reference
10-tree-1
name
1029
tree-preservation-order

undefined

10-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.034734 50.862010)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.034663 50.862002,-1.034666 50.862016,-1.034676 50.862029,-1.034692 50.862039,-1.034711 50.862046,-1.034733 50.862048,-1.034755 50.862046,-1.034775 50.862040,-1.034791 50.862030,-1.034801 50.862017,-1.034805 50.862004,-1.034802 50.861990,-1.034792 50.861977,-1.034777 50.861967,-1.034757 50.861960,-1.034735 50.861958,-1.034713 50.861960,-1.034693 50.861966,-1.034677 50.861976,-1.034667 50.861989,-1.034663 50.862002)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL